A good friend once told me, "Give a man a fish and he will eat well for day, but teach a man to fish, and he will sit in a boat drinking beer with his friends all weekend." Such is the plight of modern man, and all the increased knowledge and technology in the world doesn't necessarily make us any better off.
As such, this adage can be used to describe the advent and subsequent growth in popularity of satellite radio reception.
While it has been very slow to gain speed, its business model, which is based on the idea of providing technology that's advertising-free, has already been proven to be successful for others. If you've ever watched TV with the aid of TiVo or any other digital recorder, you are well aware that going back to being interrupted by commercials every few minutes is even more painful than viewing pictures online via dial-up.
To be fair, I for one am completely impressed by any appliance (household, automotive, or otherwise) that can actually receive information from outer space. Having said that, I listen to satellite radio everyday at work and can all but guarantee that should you happen to tune in to the 80s station on a Tuesday at 4:44pm EST, you'll hear Nena's "99 Luft Balloons." Same time Wednesday? "Stray Cats Strut."
Now, this fault alone doesn't suggest that there won't come a time when the AM/FM button on your car radio will feel as out of place as a Kenny G fan at a Jay-Z concert. Heavy-hitters Howard Stern and Eminem are pretty much ensuring that with their mega-dollar deals. These old radio frequencies are bound, however, to hang on for a while. The last radio shake-up this big was in 1939 when FM innovator Edwin Armstrong pushed heavily for the radio industry to accept his "new" frequency in the face of strong opposition from AM radio maker, RCA chief David Sarnoff.
While AM and FW have been able to coexist, satellite seems to be the bully on the block, offering digital quality sound and an easy to use category format. Oh yeah, and there is that other thing: whereas once auto manufacturers were willing to throw in a radio for free, satellite will cost you a few hundred bucks in hardware and over $100 per year subscription fees.
True, I would rather set my own head on fire and put it out with a baseball bat than listen to another AUTOMOTIVE SUPERSTORE BLOWOUT SALE ad on the FM frequency. But is it really worth the ten bucks a month? What else am I really getting? The choice of musical genre, you might say. Do we not already have that flexibility from the dozens of AM/FM stations in our respective areas? The satellite companies boast that their customers can better tailor their listening experience to their specific tastes. If that's the case, MP3 players, with their unlimited mix, compilation, and category functions, seem like much more of a threat to satellite radio than AM/FM.
By the way, all of you traditionalist "books on tape" fans need not worry; a few manufacturers still make those cassette things, and you can now download the latest bestseller onto your iPod anyway.
For an interesting angle on Satellite Radio, please see:
http://www.aiada.org/article.asp?id=25544


Recent Comments